Now, I don't know, but here are some thoughts:.

Simply said, the object of the secret societies is a new world order. How? Here may be one way.

These folks may be looking to disgust enough of us here and round the world of war and the United States. (Maybe even "Democracy.") ... and then proffer a "peace pill" from ... China.

The secret societies are the major black-market traffickers, making money and creating structure in both the Orient and Occident.

As "they" are "solidifying" their presence here so have they been solidifying their presence in China.

Psst! ... follow the money.

And China's families are primarily one-child units. The sociological ramifications are immense.

It makes "control" so much easier.

Do you remember the movie Rollerball? The one with James Caan.

Here are some of the movie's advertising tag-lines:

In the not-too-distant future, wars will no longer exist...

This movie will haunt your future ... because it's almost here!

The next war will not be fought - it will be played.

In the future there will be no war. There will only be Rollerball.

In the not-too-distant future, wars will no longer exist. But there will be Rollerball

In Rollerball, corporations rule the world. A world where elites and their "friends" may live a privileged lifestyle of their choosing, while the rest are kept within strict boundaries and enthralled by sex and violence, ... bondage. Hmm, ... gee, that sounds familiar ...

The road to one future is being paved by Wal-Mart.

Here may be some groundwork being laid down for a plutocratic synarchical scenario of the secret societies "ruling" through the Chinese. This presentation is by Fareed Zakaria, member of the secret society Order of Scroll & Key. the Editor of Newsweek International, has a show on PBS called Foreign Exchange, appears regularly on ABC's This Week and was managing editor of the Council on Foreign Relations' magazine Foreign Affairs from 1992 to 2000.

From: http://foreignexchange.tv/?q=node/405&PHPSESSID=84085901c8446a9c38b5699921dc80ae

or you may view the interview at: http://foreignexchange.tv/?q=node/419

IN DEPTH: Wu Jianmin

Fareed Zakaria: As China grows economically, some in the United States have begun talking about a strategic rivalry between China and the US. At a recent conference in Singapore, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld accused China of masking its military build-up and threatening Asian security by the positioning of hundreds of missile facing Taiwan.
Chinese Diplomats and its ruling elites are very cautious about discussing these kinds of issues on the record. But when I was in China recently I was able to sit down with one of its senior most members of the foreign service--Ambassador Wu Jianmin, and do just that.
* * *
Fareed Zakaria: President Wu, when we were talking privately you mentioned to me that you saw the cover of Newsweek which says China’s Century or the Chinese Century and you looked at it and you said I get frightened when I see something like that. What did you mean?

Jianmin: Yes; in the first I asked my--myself what does it mean--China Century? When people say this what does it mean…? China is going to dominate; no, the Chinese are not interested in domination. In the [Inaudible] the important part of [Dong Xiaoping’s] legacy for--for Chinese is don’t--do not seek hegemony. Do not seek Dong(nation) is first point. Second, you mean China would be the--the leading country in the world? Yes; China is growing very rapidly but last year our GDPs were only 1.6 trillion US dollars. GDPs of the US is eight times China’s. Then in terms of the per capita GDP, China is very low. I think US per capita GDPs is 30 or 40 times China. We have a long way to go. Then you know we have the Chinese saying which goes like--like this--When you reach top you feel lonely and cold. [Laughs] We Chinese, we like to share. [Laughs]

Fareed Zakaria: And this is of course part of what has been called China’s Peaceful Rise Doctrine?

Jianmin: Right.

Fareed Zakaria: But how is it possible for a country this big to grow as fast as it is, to have the kind of size that--that you have, the impact on the global economy and for them not to be ripple effects? I mean you’re now the second or third largest consumer of almost every commodity in the world--oil, natural gas. Isn’t this going to shake things up?

Jianmin: Yes; we are going to shake things--true, but there are two ways to--to do it. One is--our first is by force; second in a peaceful way. We Chinese, we like to take it the second--the second approach. Why? For two reasons; first the world is changing. Fifty-four--fifty-five years ago when things went wrong in your country, we Chinese were happy because we--we fought each other in Korea. Thirty years ago, whatever happened to--to US economy it did not have any impact on China. But today, if things go wrong, yeah I mean if your economy is in bad shape, we are sorry about that. If things are going well in your country we are happy about that because things are going well that may have good impact on China. Things are changing; there’s a growing inter-dependence between China and US.

Fareed Zakaria: So what do you say to those Americans who worry? They say China has so many of our Treasury Bills. Our debt is owned in large measure by Asian countries and China is one of the largest holders of US Government Treasuries. Is there a danger that China will use that in some way as leverage in some geo-political issue?

Jianmin: I don’t think so; you see we bought a lot of it--T-Bonds of your country because it’s a way to keep our foreign currency reserves. It’s--I think it works both ways; it’s good for--for China. It’s good for--for US. China will not use it as a leverage against the US. You know there’s such inter-dependence between US and China; we’ve got to cooperate and work together. My second part is look at the Chinese history. From Century One to Century Fifteen, China was a leading nation in the world. We had all--I mean technological, scientific assets; the Chinese did not use that to dominate the world. Even less today, you see they say peace is part of the Chinese culture. Confucius said 2,500 years ago [Laughs] peace is something most precious; I think Chinese will stick to that tradition.

Fareed Zakaria: Let me ask you about Taiwan.

Jianmin: Yes.

Fareed Zakaria: Many Americans worry that there will be a real conflict between China and the United States over Taiwan. Do you believe that there’s a real danger of--of war, of China using military force to reunify the Mainland with Taiwan?

Jianmin: You know China will use the force as a last resort. No country in the world tolerates the separation of the part--their territory from the mother land. Taiwan is part of China, you know. Then in Taiwan, there’s some forces, anti--I mean secessionist forces; they are working. They like to separate Taiwan from China; of course we will not tolerate this.

Fareed Zakaria: But the reality is that Taiwan exists as an independent entity right now.

Jianmin: Not as independent entity; you know Taiwan exists--true. Taiwan, we have--they have a government, they have a people, they have territory but they don’t have international recognition. [Laughs] The whole international community recognized them with China. You see this is a true--but the secessionists, they like to separate Taiwan from China. They like to--want to cross the red line. So we told [Inaudible], please do respect the three joint communications between China and the US. Provided that--the other side, they do not cross the red line, China will not use force. We use force as a last resort.

Fareed Zakaria: So how will this work itself out? What--what do you think--what do you look forward 10, 15, 20 years…

Jianmin: Yes.

Fareed Zakaria: … what will happen?
Jianmin: Ten or fifteen years I hope that we can achieve a peaceful solution [Laughs], peaceful reunification of the mother land.

Fareed Zakaria: Which would happen with the consent of the Taiwanese people?

Jianmin: I believe so. I believe so, because you see we’re not achieving it without their--their consent. One country--two systems; we’re--we’re working in that way. It works in Hong Kong and [Inaudible]. You see we achieve that in that way.

Fareed Zakaria: On North Korea…

Jianmin: Yes.

Fareed Zakaria: Many Americans feel that China should be more helpful, that China needs to recognize now that it is a real global power or at least a regional power, that the proliferation of nuclear weapons is not in its interest and it should be using leverage against North Korea because after all it is the only country that has only leverage.

Jianmin: The food, oil, energy supply basically is humanitarian. DPRK is China’s next door neighbor. Should we use--cut their food supply, oil supply it would bring about a humanitarian disaster. I think it’s not a viable solution. You see a humanitarian disaster next door; it’s outrageous. In terms of the human rights we shouldn’t--we shouldn’t do that. It doesn’t mean that China did not get the message across. Even President [Inaudible] said very--in a very clear cut way to the--to the DPRK, please come back to six-party talks. We think that Korean [peninsula] should be nuclear free; that will--that will be in the best interest of your [security]. You think that you--through that--going nuclear will assure your [security]; it’s not true.

Fareed Zakaria: Do you think it will work without the--the threat of some kind of pressure?
Jianmin: I think you know we need some patience. The only other alternative is using force. Look at Iraq; it didn’t work. So I think the--the peaceful solution--it may take some time. We’ve got to understand it because the mistrust between the US and the DPRK is so deep. Theoretically speaking you are still at war with the DPRK. There’s no peace treaty between the US and the DPRK. You know more than 50 years--a lot of hatred, a lot of resentment, a lot of mistrust; we need time to--to get it over.

Fareed Zakaria: Ambassador, well we thank you. You--you represent the great tradition of Chinese diplomacy when you talk about patience. There is that famous story of Kissinger and [Chou En-Lai] talking and Kissinger asks [Chou En-Lai], what do you think of the French Revolution? And [Chou En-Lai] said to him, it’s too soon to tell.

Jianmin: [Laughs]

Fareed Zakaria: Thank you very much.

Jianmin: Thank you.

[Music]
China's Might
China's economic output is $1.6 trillion.
It's expected to triple over the next 15 years, overtaking Japan in 2015 and the U.S. by 2039.
Source: Newsweek

======

Let's change the world.
Onward to the utmost of futures.
Peace,
Om
K